efa-project.org

If 'top' shows a load of 100%, and mysqld is the culprit, you'll need to find out why at the time it is happening. The best way is to use mysqladmin and see what queries are running with the following commands:

mysqladmin status -uroot -p`grep ROOT /etc/EFA-Config | awk -F: '{print $2 ...

done.

I'll try to debug it when I have a free moment and post the results to that thread.

shawniverson wrote: 13 Apr 2017 15:38 Session timeouts improvements coming, stay tuned.

That'd be a useful improvement.

still a problem?

I saw that error briefly while updating from 3.0.1.8 to 3.0.1.9 but then it went away in a later stage of the process.

It's an issue in 3.0.2.1 as well.

Are there any quick fixes, or am I going to have to dig through the mailscanner code to find out what they broke?

Look in the /etc/EFA-Config file. You'll find the mysql root password there.

From the shell command prompt, it's

Sorry ovizii, I've been away from EFA for a few months.

Are you still having an issue, or is it all resolved now?

Sounds risky.

Since I am using a free account, I update every 35 hours, since I don't want to be a rude guest.

If you are using a paid account, then updating several times per day should be acceptable.

I'm curious, why do your users care where the mail came from? Why do you need to inform them by modifying the subject?

edit /etc/clamav-unofficial-sigs/master.conf

search for "malwarepatrol" and follow the instructions in the comments to configure your system to receive your malware patrol updates

run "sudo freshclam -v" to see if your system picks up the malware patrol signatures.

I'm not sure what will ...

I did a search and I found the following answer in the first link
That will manually rotate your log files for you.

Do that, and then let us know if you're still getting the error messages

I believe that it is a feature of postfix, but I've never used it before and I don't know how it works. I think someone in the forums has done this before, so using google search should turn up a result.

EFA doesn't support it directly, so you wouldn't be able to use EFA to directly manage your ...

Interesting question. Short answer, I don't know exactly.

SPF can have three settings for all:
+all - don't care about SPF, accept everything
-all - only accept from SPF defined entries, reject anything else
~all - only SPF defined servers is acceptable, but accept anything else but call it a ...

Link?

What is relay server? Is it yours? Is it EFA? Is it a remote system?

mpndang,

without getting specific error messages, it's almost impossible to debug your problem.

Every upgrade I've done (except 1) worked without a problem. The one upgrade I did have a problem with, I found the solution by searching these forums, including the exact steps needed to get past the ...

I'm currently evaluating Devuan - Debian without the hated systemd

relay=xx.xx.xx.xx[xx.xx.xx.xx]:25

Is this your server, or the remote server?

It's not a script, it's a spamassassin setting.

In your case, it looks like the header your provider adds is
X-SPF-Result: s01.spamexperts.axc.nl: domain of marktplaats.nl designates 5.255.156.8 as permitted sender

Can you gather some other X-SPF-Result headers from your other messages so we can ...

Ok, so you have the same problem I have.

Mail goes through a provider before being delivered to your the efa server.

So imagine I set my spf record to mx:mail.example.com ~all (accept mail from mail.example.com, and it's possible that I might send mail from other servers) and I send you a message ...

Oh, I think I understand.

You have mail from facebook being sent to your server. However, you have a service that filters your mail (spamexperts.axc.nl) before sending it to your mailserver.

Can you confirm if that is correct?

or is it because your spf record is not set up correctly?

perhaps if you share your domain with me, I can help you check your spf record to determine where the problem is.

shawniverson,

I've added a comment with some of the changes I made to the status.php page. You may or may not find them useful for you.

Just what are you trying to accomplish exactly? I assume redundancy, or more machines for a system that process lots of mail?