efa-project.org

It's alive..
IT'S ALIVE!!

Interested! I was almost going to switch to AlmaLinux 8 or RockyLinux 8, but if v5 is going to be Deb/Ub, I can wait

Thank you all! restarting php-fpm did the job, and enabled php-fpm too

PHP 7.4 differs from PHP 7.2 on a specific part I guess?

Yep, there was an update: Mail works, just tested, so it seems to be the webinterface/server only. /etc/cron.daily/0yum-daily.cron:   warning: /etc/php.ini created as /etc/php.ini.rpmnew warning: /etc/php-fpm.d/www.conf created as /etc/php-fpm.d/www.conf.rpmnew   Preparing to update eFa... checkmodu...

Did a DB repair from menu, service seems to stop and start allright.
Services seem to be running though.

I might want to restore the system to yesterday if all fails.

So this morning I wanted to login to EFA, seeing: 503 Service Unavailable The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later. ? Services at the cli seem to run? I am not a real linux guru to figure out what is wrong now. ...

Feb 5 10:12:10.286 [81210] warn: config: invalid regexp for __LOCAL_FROM_TLD_1 '/@.{1,}\.com/iU': invalid end delimiter/mods 0.00229 Feb 5 10:12:10.286 [81210] warn: config: invalid regexp for __LOCAL_FROM_TLD_2 '/@.{1,}\.nl/iU': invalid end delimiter/mods 1.0E-5 Feb 5 10:12:10.286 [81210] warn: con...

I added my own file "z_TLD.cf" in /etc/mail/spamassassin
Did a Lint test and seems fine.

I want to allow only certain Top Level Domain names, skipping actually everything for us which is spam. My extra spam rule: # add points if the From address is not a valid host in a listed TLD header LOCAL_FROM_TLD From !~ /@.{1,}\.(com|nl|net|be|de|eu)/i describe LOCAL_FROM_TLD Sender is not a vali...

You should work for MS.. If it can be that quick

I'll try tuesday, there is something with that day...

Aaahhh...
It's not Windows 10...

Thanks, I had a bad start this morning. You should have heared me LOL

I can however try any update manually, now I took away the daily cron job for the time being.
Snapshots will make my life easier now

Strange behavior of mails being sent by EFA to the back-end numerous times until an error is trhown something about too many hops.
A well, will have to look at it a later time....

Well, I have a reason. Update killed EFA4... Now applying a restore. But need to de-activate auto update asap... /etc/cron.daily/0yum-daily.cron:   warning: /var/lib/unbound/root.key saved as /var/lib/unbound/root.key.rpmsave warning: /etc/unbound/unbound.conf created as /etc/unbound/unbound.conf.rp...

Found it.

score FORGED_SPF_HELO 0.01
score SPF_SOFTFAIL 0.01
score SPF_FAIL 0.01

After a reboot it now works.

Well, tried the HOLD but that doesn't work (setup is clearly different from other mailscanner setups it seems) I see that we have a "Milter" queu as well, so looks like the header_checks might be done after mailscanner... So we need to alter the scores of spamassassin. Made a new z_MyConfi...

EFA does use mailscanner right?

https://www.mailscanner.info/postfix/

Because it seems to be a bit different than explained at their website.

I don't have the /^Recieved/ HOLD action in the header_checks file.

No it remains prety much the same. It now states strip: instead of ignore: in the logs Fun fact: Looking at the headers in my received e-mail, it is actually gone!! But in Mailwatch, it is shown and therefore cannot be acted upon So it is probably a process-order of some kind. 2 things that popup du...

Found out about WARN. Thanks! Jun 12 12:30:07 mailgtw postfix/cleanup[8742]: 49jxnC1STHz52w32: warning: header Received: from mx01.bsmtpprovider.nl (smtp01.bsmtpprovider.nl [94.124.121.11])??(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))??(No client certificate requested)??by...

This is an example of a real header. (all but the addresses) I don't know much about postfix (I'm just a MS guy (but all servers are linux at home anyway lol) ) so what about WARN or INFO? Is that something to trigger the logs? Received: from mx03.bhosted.nl (smtp21.bhosted.nl [94.124.121.33]) (usin...

Okay, So I am trying to get rid of a header from my bSMTP provider. This will eventually take care of SPF_FAIL and other added spam scores to the message when it actually isn't spam. As an example(!) I added this rule in /etc/postfix/header_checks /^Received:\ from\ mx01.shosted.com\ \(smtp01.shoste...

Is this btw the answer to my problem? SPF checks that the IP address of the sending server is authorized by the owner of the domain that appears in the SMTP MAIL FROM command. (The email address in MAIL FROM is also called envelope-from or 5321.MailFrom.) In addition to requiring that the SPF check ...

Fun fact is: When I login as admin, I see the "From" inside the header. When I login as the user, I see the "From" as the field "From" using the link "View" in the spam report. Now I could whitelist it there, but I don't think that will help as it didn't help ...

Shawn,
Would you be able to tell me in short how to whitelist something in EFA based on a part of the header?
Where would I be searching for?
Something I need to "script" or configure in a spamassasin config or something else?
Thanks in advance!