I have been noticing the system is wanting to do a package check/update. Today I performed such a check using option 13.
there were 184 items that were potential updates.
I am saying potential because the following message appears:
Code: Select all
Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction.
You can remove cached packages by executing 'yum clean packages'.
Error: Transaction test error:
file /etc/centos-release from install of rocky-release-8.8-1.8.el8.noarch conflicts with file from package centos-stream-release-8.6-1.el8.noarch
file /etc/redhat-release from install of rocky-release-8.8-1.8.el8.noarch conflicts with file from package centos-stream-release-8.6-1.el8.noarch
file /etc/system-release from install of rocky-release-8.8-1.8.el8.noarch conflicts with file from package centos-stream-release-8.6-1.el8.noarch
file /etc/system-release-cpe from install of rocky-release-8.8-1.8.el8.noarch conflicts with file from package centos-stream-release-8.6-1.el8.noarch
file /usr/lib/os-release from install of rocky-release-8.8-1.8.el8.noarch conflicts with file from package centos-stream-release-8.6-1.el8.noarch
file /usr/lib/systemd/system-preset/85-display-manager.preset from install of rocky-release-8.8-1.8.el8.noarch conflicts with file from package centos-stream-release-8.6-1.el8.noarch
file /usr/lib/systemd/system-preset/90-default.preset from install of rocky-release-8.8-1.8.el8.noarch conflicts with file from package centos-stream-release-8.6-1.el8.noarch
file /usr/lib/systemd/system-preset/99-default-disable.preset from install of rocky-release-8.8-1.8.el8.noarch conflicts with file from package centos-stream-release-8.6-1.el8.noarch
file /usr/share/redhat-release from install of rocky-release-8.8-1.8.el8.noarch conflicts with file from package centos-stream-release-8.6-1.el8.noarch
Press [Enter] key to continue...
SO I will post this ask:
Is the project still going to be supported?
What is the stance on the project going forward? Given what RedHat did, is there an alternate path being planned?
Security Onion posted this blog article: https://blog.securityonion.net/2023/07/ ... se-os.html This week the group celebrated their 2.4 release which uses Oracle Linux 9. The group has been quite transparent via the blog article.
I know a lot of the efforts are center around Shawn, but I am willing to help -- feel free to post.