The future of eFa (poll)

Request and discuss new features you would like to have.
Post Reply

Where should we focus?

eFa is okay, don't make radical changes! (general improvements of existing software, maintain compatibility)
4
44%
eFa could be better with some minor changes (key components change, maintain compatibility)
4
44%
eFa could be better with some major changes (key components change, potential loss of compatibility)
1
11%
eFa is not okay, make radical changes! (replacing with something else, abandon eFa as it exists today)
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 9

User avatar
shawniverson
Posts: 3104
Joined: 13 Jan 2014 23:30
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana USA
Contact:

The future of eFa (poll)

Post by shawniverson » 28 Jun 2020 16:55

Hello folks! :D

In my opinion, eFa is okay and can do the job but as you may be aware, it is based on some pretty old (but tried and true) software. I believe it could be better, and I am starting to get to a point where I can focus on it again.

So, my question for everyone is, where should I and others focus our efforts? This will help me in knowing how radical or cautious I should be moving forward.

Here's a poll to act as a sort of spectrum :dance:

Thanks in advance for your feedback :clap:
Version eFa 4.0.2 now available!

User avatar
pdwalker
Posts: 1293
Joined: 18 Mar 2015 09:16

Re: The future of eFa (poll)

Post by pdwalker » 29 Jun 2020 19:43

All the rage these days is reskinning a perfectly usable UI for something "sexy".

Please don't do that. Focus on adding whatever changes make using EFA better.

Yes, being able to use the UI on a mobile device is nice, but if I need to manage the system, I'll get to a computer with a web browser, large screen and ssh.

henk
Posts: 463
Joined: 14 Dec 2015 22:16
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: The future of eFa (poll)

Post by henk » 01 Jul 2020 09:01

Agree 100%.

User avatar
shawniverson
Posts: 3104
Joined: 13 Jan 2014 23:30
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana USA
Contact:

Re: The future of eFa (poll)

Post by shawniverson » 05 Jul 2020 17:03

Oh come on where is everybody's sense of adventure! :lol:

So, thanks to everyone for your responses. The message I am receiving is to maintain compatibility, split 50/50 between options 1 and 2 at the moment.

Therefore, the eFa roadmap would be as follows based on feedback:

1) Maintain compatibility
2) Component changes must be backward compatible, either...
a) As an option you can toggle between
b) As a fully compatible alternative
3) Focus on functionality

Things that probably fit the roadmap
Postscreen support
Ongoing software updates
Latest distro support (i.e CentOS 8)
Engine enhancements (MTA level scanning)
RFC compliant enhancements (i.e. OpenARC)
Any other ideas the community has :)

Things that probably don't fit the roadmap
Engine replacement
GUI replacement
MTA replacement
Major distro changes
Version eFa 4.0.2 now available!

User avatar
pdwalker
Posts: 1293
Joined: 18 Mar 2015 09:16

Re: The future of eFa (poll)

Post by pdwalker » 06 Jul 2020 12:36

Sounds good. Although you may want to move the Centos 8 compatibility up a bit so you'll have a new more years to work on the other things.

Post Reply