Hey guys.
I've successfully set EFA as our antispam server. Now I would like to use SA learn. When I tag one email for SA learn as Spam, I get this message:
Interesting is that under Recent messages is Status Learned as Spam.
So my question is... Is this SA learn working correctly?
One more thing... Under Spam report I don't see any Bayes.
SA Learn config: path "/root/.spamassassin" is inaccessible
Re: SA Learn config: path "/root/.spamassassin" is inaccessible
Under "Tools and Links" is another link to "SpamAssassin Bayes Database Info". When you click on that link, what do you get?
Mine looks like:
Mine looks like:
Re: SA Learn config: path "/root/.spamassassin" is inaccessible
Hi, this is our Bayes Database Information:
Re: SA Learn config: path "/root/.spamassassin" is inaccessible
See: viewtopic.php?t=2350
“We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works.” -Douglas Adams
Re: SA Learn config: path "/root/.spamassassin" is inaccessible
Also, the bayes database needs to be trained on a minimum number of messages before it starts showing results. Feed it more spam and ham (100 minimum?) and then your system will benefit from the bayesian analysis.
Re: SA Learn config: path "/root/.spamassassin" is inaccessible
SA Learn config: path "/root/.spamassassin" is inaccessible was resolved with EFA server restart (link from henk).
For Bayes learning I will have to wait to receive more then 100 mails as said pdwalker.
For Bayes learning I will have to wait to receive more then 100 mails as said pdwalker.
Re: SA Learn config: path "/root/.spamassassin" is inaccessible
Bayes stared to work after 200 detected spams.
Re: SA Learn config: path "/root/.spamassassin" is inaccessible
Keep an eye on your BAYES scores. If you are confident the BAYES is helping, then you can increase the spamscore on the top end.
For example, I use a score of 4.0 for BAYES_99 and a score of 2.0 for BAYES_999 (bayes_999 is additive to bayes_99 on my system thus the final score is +6.0). These numbers are higher than the default and it seems to work well for me)
For example, I use a score of 4.0 for BAYES_99 and a score of 2.0 for BAYES_999 (bayes_999 is additive to bayes_99 on my system thus the final score is +6.0). These numbers are higher than the default and it seems to work well for me)