[solved] Using an intermediate mail provider messes up my spamassassin scores
Posted: 14 Nov 2017 07:01
Ok, I've a problem that I wonder if someone can help me solve.
I use an intermediate mail service that scans all my incoming mail for viruses (messagelabs.com). However one problem I have is that all mail, according to spamassassin, comes from them.
For example, take a recent message: Here's an annoying spam that the bayes classifier got right (I've added extra weighting to bayes since it does such a good job), but that the RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED got wrong.
Here is the received path: The last two addresses are legitimate, but the first "received via" is the true culprit.
What I would like is for somehow to tell spamassassin to ignore any of the messagelabs addresses for the RBL checks.
Is there a simple way to do this? I don't just want to whitelist the addresses as I do get legitimate spam (heh!) from these addresses as I want to accept all spam and let EFA decide if it is really spam or not.
Any thoughts, hints or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
I use an intermediate mail service that scans all my incoming mail for viruses (messagelabs.com). However one problem I have is that all mail, according to spamassassin, comes from them.
For example, take a recent message: Here's an annoying spam that the bayes classifier got right (I've added extra weighting to bayes since it does such a good job), but that the RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED got wrong.
Here is the received path: The last two addresses are legitimate, but the first "received via" is the true culprit.
What I would like is for somehow to tell spamassassin to ignore any of the messagelabs addresses for the RBL checks.
Is there a simple way to do this? I don't just want to whitelist the addresses as I do get legitimate spam (heh!) from these addresses as I want to accept all spam and let EFA decide if it is really spam or not.
Any thoughts, hints or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.