greylisted ip addresses not displayed correctly

Report bugs and workarounds
Post Reply
mensan
Posts: 3
Joined: 17 Oct 2017 19:37

greylisted ip addresses not displayed correctly

Post by mensan » 17 Oct 2017 19:42

On the greylisted page I am showing 4 active sessions. Only 1 of the IP addresses shows correctly. The other 3 only show 3 octets.

Attached is a pick.
Attachments
Capture.PNG
Capture.PNG (8.36 KiB) Viewed 2199 times

User avatar
shawniverson
Posts: 2900
Joined: 13 Jan 2014 23:30
Location: Rushville, Indiana, USA
Contact:

Re: greylisted ip addresses not displayed correctly

Post by shawniverson » 17 Oct 2017 22:19

That's normal for greylisting. That is a class C representation in SGWI.
Version eFa 4.0.0 now available!

mensan
Posts: 3
Joined: 17 Oct 2017 19:37

Re: greylisted ip addresses not displayed correctly

Post by mensan » 18 Oct 2017 17:00

I still can't see in what universe those are IPV4 addresses. They're missing octets.. which makes the information useless.

User avatar
shawniverson
Posts: 2900
Joined: 13 Jan 2014 23:30
Location: Rushville, Indiana, USA
Contact:

Re: greylisted ip addresses not displayed correctly

Post by shawniverson » 18 Oct 2017 18:04

31.184.286 is short for 31.184.286.0/24
Version eFa 4.0.0 now available!

budy
Posts: 74
Joined: 10 Sep 2017 07:33

Re: greylisted ip addresses not displayed correctly

Post by budy » 19 Oct 2017 08:31

What about other, more odd netmasks, e.g. /23? That wouldn't be easily recognizeable, would it?

User avatar
shawniverson
Posts: 2900
Joined: 13 Jan 2014 23:30
Location: Rushville, Indiana, USA
Contact:

Re: greylisted ip addresses not displayed correctly

Post by shawniverson » 20 Oct 2017 21:52

That not how sqlgrey works.

If enough addresses show up in a /24 space, it whitelists the whole /24.
Version eFa 4.0.0 now available!

mensan
Posts: 3
Joined: 17 Oct 2017 19:37

Re: greylisted ip addresses not displayed correctly

Post by mensan » 21 Oct 2017 12:04

When I looked thru the logs... it was a COMPLETE class C. The end wasn't a .0 in this case was actually a .78 Soooo the app has a bug that is not displaying the complete address.

Post Reply