Search found 74 matches
- 28 Mar 2018 07:53
- Forum: Discussion
- Topic: interesting reporting tool: sendmailanalyzer
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4505
Re: interesting reporting tool: sendmailanalyzer
I have been using sendmailanalyzer for years and I always found it to be a good tool to have.
- 06 Mar 2018 21:47
- Forum: 3.x Bugs
- Topic: mark message as spam doesn't work
- Replies: 14
- Views: 12616
Re: mark message as spam doesn't work
Well… afaiks, pdwalker is correct. He asked for the specific text of the link in the footer of your messages. E.g, this is what such a link in the messages, which I get from my eFa, looks like: This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by E.F.A. Project, and is believed to be c...
- 06 Mar 2018 10:23
- Forum: 3.x Bugs
- Topic: ClamAV Vulnerabilities
- Replies: 43
- Views: 31673
Re: ClamAV Vulnerabilities
Hi henk,
thanks, that solved it.
Thanks,
budy
thanks, that solved it.
Thanks,
budy
- 05 Mar 2018 18:15
- Forum: 3.x Bugs
- Topic: ClamAV Vulnerabilities
- Replies: 43
- Views: 31673
Re: ClamAV Vulnerabilities
Hmmm… my clamav is still on 0.99.2 but yum update won't server a newer one: [root@efa yum.repos.d]# yum list clamav Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, security Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * EFA: dl.efa-project.org * base: ftp.rz.uni-frankfurt.de * epel: mirror.de.leaseweb.net * extras: ft...
- 05 Mar 2018 17:51
- Forum: How-to
- Topic: Spammer Alert
- Replies: 20
- Views: 17098
Re: Spammer Alert
But first, change it on the database!
- 03 Mar 2018 10:32
- Forum: Discussion
- Topic: firewall setting
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3618
Re: firewall setting
This is not so much a setting in your firewall, but the MX record in your public DNS defines, where incoming mail should be relayed to. If you don't have youe eFa exposed to the internet, either directly or via a DMZ, then a port forwarding of port 25/557 in your firewall to eFa for incoming externa...
- 21 Dec 2017 19:10
- Forum: How-to
- Topic: Problem sending Mails
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3567
Re: Problem sending Mails
Hi, looks like your eFa picked the backup mx of rzone.de. I just queried rzone.de's mx record and it shows something different for me: budy:~ budy$ host -t mx rzone.de rzone.de mail is handled by 10 fwmx.rzone.de. budy:~ budy$ host fwmx.rzone.de fwmx.rzone.de has address 81.169.144.237 fwmx.rzone.de...
- 25 Nov 2017 16:50
- Forum: How-to
- Topic: Relay Mail to external mailserver
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1594
Re: Relay Mail to external mailserver
Really? You are using eFa to get e-mail from external servers and then relay it to other external servers? That doesn't sound to be a too clever setup, is it? Or do you mean, you are relaying the messages to another internal postfix server? If that is the case, add eFa's IP to the trusted networks o...
- 21 Nov 2017 15:44
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Working with large black/whitelists
- Replies: 9
- Views: 10792
Re: Working with large black/whitelists
Given the transient nature of the internet in general, do you really feel this is a very good idea to pursue?
- 19 Nov 2017 14:18
- Forum: Discussion
- Topic: Protect privacy
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5805
Re: Protect privacy
What are trying to gain from that? E-Mail in itself isn't encrypted and sending confidential information via non-encrypted e-mail is a failure right from the start. I think the appropriate way to handle these issues are policies and audits. Don't try to turn eFa into something is isn't meant to be a...
- 13 Nov 2017 19:04
- Forum: Discussion
- Topic: Release: error code 75 returned from Sendmail: sendmail: fatal:
- Replies: 22
- Views: 18465
Re: Release: error code 75 returned from Sendmail: sendmail: fatal:
Take a look at your posfix log file in /var/log/maillog, there you should be able to track your released messages down…
- 03 Nov 2017 18:42
- Forum: How-to
- Topic: Definition on sshd_config are not reflected
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4430
Re: Definition on sshd_config are not reflected
If you turn off smtp, http, https access, than you could very well just shutdown your efa box, as it will be of no further use…
- 03 Nov 2017 18:40
- Forum: 3.x Bugs
- Topic: Deliver Cleaned Messages and/or Files
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4319
Re: Deliver Cleaned Messages and/or Files
Hi Ronald, Nov 3 13:31:09 sys-mailgw12 MailScanner[19353]: Clamd::INFECTED:: Heuristics.OLE2.ContainsMacros :: ./13CB2100054.A28F0/Buro Bau Jaarrekening 2016.xls the above states, that MailScanner has deviced to not let that xls file pass. This actually a good practise and sending any kind of MS act...
- 02 Nov 2017 17:39
- Forum: How-to
- Topic: Definition on sshd_config are not reflected
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4430
Re: Definition on sshd_config are not reflected
What does your iptable look like. The way you added those rules will append them after any other rule already existing and thus it is no wonder that they don't do anything… This is my iptable setup, I haven't done much tinkering with it,except adding support for the check-mk-agent: [root@efa ~]# ipt...
- 26 Oct 2017 15:33
- Forum: 3.x Bugs
- Topic: Personal spam thresholds are ignored
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8646
Re: Personal spam thresholds are ignored
Well, there has been an admin account already. And that admin account also had the thresholds set up, so it doesn't seem that MailScanner still does this.
- 25 Oct 2017 18:52
- Forum: 3.x Bugs
- Topic: Personal spam thresholds are ignored
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8646
Re: Personal spam thresholds are ignored
…soo… it seems, that having thresholds set to 0/0 doesn't actually resolve to the domain's defaults of 5/7, but lead to the accounts messages are not checked for spam. Once I manually set user-defined thresholds in the user list as the admin user, messages started to be recognized as spam. I surely ...
- 25 Oct 2017 13:21
- Forum: 3.x Bugs
- Topic: Personal spam thresholds are ignored
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8646
Re: Personal spam thresholds are ignored
Hi guys, I just checked with my eFa box at work and unfortuanetly I have to treport, that it doesn't seem enough for the users to be in the list, as almost none of them is checked for spam. I have just run a report on messages that have a spam assassin score of 5+ and got 5k+ results, where almost n...
- 20 Oct 2017 13:02
- Forum: 3.x Bugs
- Topic: blacklist - adding address not working
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6997
Re: blacklist - adding address not working
Downloading the current version of FF ist amlost the first thing I do, when I need to do any work on any Windows installation…
- 19 Oct 2017 10:14
- Forum: How-to
- Topic: Where can I edit the scores for RECEIVED_IN_MSPIKE?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4087
Re: Where can I edit the scores for RECEIVED_IN_MSPIKE?
Yeah - I know, but from looking at Anubis site, what qualifies the H2 hosts to be more trustworthy then the higher ones?
H3 to H5 only get their SA scores reduced marginally. H5 gets credit of only -1.0, H3 and H4 only receive -0.1 each.
H3 to H5 only get their SA scores reduced marginally. H5 gets credit of only -1.0, H3 and H4 only receive -0.1 each.
- 19 Oct 2017 08:31
- Forum: 3.x Bugs
- Topic: greylisted ip addresses not displayed correctly
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4781
Re: greylisted ip addresses not displayed correctly
What about other, more odd netmasks, e.g. /23? That wouldn't be easily recognizeable, would it?
- 19 Oct 2017 07:25
- Forum: How-to
- Topic: Where can I edit the scores for RECEIVED_IN_MSPIKE?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4087
Re: Where can I edit the scores for RECEIVED_IN_MSPIKE?
Great - thanks. Now looking at the scores, can anybody enlighten me as of why a message received in H2 gets such an excellent score:
72_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 0.001 -2.800 0.001 -2.800
when the higher reputation senders don't?
72_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 0.001 -2.800 0.001 -2.800
when the higher reputation senders don't?
- 18 Oct 2017 11:05
- Forum: How-to
- Topic: Where can I edit the scores for RECEIVED_IN_MSPIKE?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4087
Where can I edit the scores for RECEIVED_IN_MSPIKE?
Hi, I want to play a bit with efa's scores regarding the mailspike scores, but I seem to be unable to find the config for those on the eFa box. I assumed, that they somewhow would show up in /etc/MailScanner/spamassasin.conf, but they don't. Where are those configured and is there a sanctioned way o...
- 17 Oct 2017 06:33
- Forum: 3.x Bugs
- Topic: razor report doesn't work
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2612
razor report doesn't work
Hi, whenever I am telling eFa to learn + report a message as spam, I am getting this result in the following screen, after hitting submit: SpamAssassin: Oct 17 08:30:40.596 [610] warn: reporter: razor2 report failed: No such file or directory report requires authentication at /usr/share/perl5/vendor...
- 17 Oct 2017 06:29
- Forum: 3.x Bugs
- Topic: Personal spam thresholds are ignored
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8646
Re: Personal spam thresholds are ignored
Yes - this totally does it - thanks!
- 17 Oct 2017 06:29
- Forum: 3.x Bugs
- Topic: Some messages are being "defaced"
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5543
Re: Some messages are being "defaced"
Hi guys, thank you for your help. I am totally aware of the risks, regarding these "masqued" links, but more often than not, automated messages from Akamai and others do contain such links and we do have a very high fluctuation of employees, which would cause in always other people filling...