Search found 11 matches
- 26 Jun 2015 13:46
- Forum: 3.x Bugs
- Topic: OpenDKIM and Inline signatures
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3235
Re: OpenDKIM and Inline signatures
Can anyone else test this and confirm it is a bug?
- 18 Jun 2015 14:18
- Forum: 3.x Bugs
- Topic: OpenDKIM and Inline signatures
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3235
OpenDKIM and Inline signatures
In reference to this thread:
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1006
Is anyone else using OpenDKIM with inline signatures turned on?
Once I enable the inline signatures, DKIM fails integrity checking.
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1006
Is anyone else using OpenDKIM with inline signatures turned on?
Once I enable the inline signatures, DKIM fails integrity checking.
- 17 Jun 2015 17:01
- Forum: How-to
- Topic: [howto] Installing and using opendkim with EFA 3.0.0.7
- Replies: 54
- Views: 558392
Re: [howto] Installing and using opendkim with EFA 3.0.0.7
Just wondering how your tests went? Right now I have the inline signatures off, but users would like them turned back on.
Maybe I should post this as a new issue?
Maybe I should post this as a new issue?
- 12 Jun 2015 13:25
- Forum: How-to
- Topic: [howto] Installing and using opendkim with EFA 3.0.0.7
- Replies: 54
- Views: 558392
Re: [howto] Installing and using opendkim with EFA 3.0.0.7
OK, let me know how that test goes. I have it turned off for now.
- 11 Jun 2015 18:01
- Forum: How-to
- Topic: [howto] Installing and using opendkim with EFA 3.0.0.7
- Replies: 54
- Views: 558392
Re: [howto] Installing and using opendkim with EFA 3.0.0.7
I can't seem to see any strange things in the files under /etc/MailScanner/reports/en.
I changed the inline.sig.in.txt and inline.sig.in.html files.
Can you verify that you have the non-spam signature option turned on?
I changed the inline.sig.in.txt and inline.sig.in.html files.
Can you verify that you have the non-spam signature option turned on?
- 11 Jun 2015 17:46
- Forum: How-to
- Topic: [howto] Installing and using opendkim with EFA 3.0.0.7
- Replies: 54
- Views: 558392
Re: [howto] Installing and using opendkim with EFA 3.0.0.7
Well, I got the DKIM errors to go away after disabling the Inline Non-Spam signature option. I modified the signatures, so I wonder if that is it.
I am going to take a look and see if those files have any strange characters in there.
I am going to take a look and see if those files have any strange characters in there.
- 11 Jun 2015 16:33
- Forum: How-to
- Topic: [howto] Installing and using opendkim with EFA 3.0.0.7
- Replies: 54
- Views: 558392
Re: [howto] Installing and using opendkim with EFA 3.0.0.7
The EFA box is the last hop, so it goes: Exchange edge --> EFA --> internet I do get the headers in /var/log/maillog also opendkim[29685]: 9E6035812D4: DKIM-Signature field added (s=default, d=xxx.com) This is so bizarre. I played around w/ setting opendkim to relaxed/relaxed but that did not help.
- 10 Jun 2015 17:19
- Forum: How-to
- Topic: [howto] Installing and using opendkim with EFA 3.0.0.7
- Replies: 54
- Views: 558392
- 10 Jun 2015 13:33
- Forum: How-to
- Topic: [howto] Installing and using opendkim with EFA 3.0.0.7
- Replies: 54
- Views: 558392
Re: [howto] Installing and using opendkim with EFA 3.0.0.7
Guess I can't use PM yet, I emailed you the domain.
- 10 Jun 2015 13:31
- Forum: How-to
- Topic: [howto] Installing and using opendkim with EFA 3.0.0.7
- Replies: 54
- Views: 558392
Re: [howto] Installing and using opendkim with EFA 3.0.0.7
Let me know how your tests turn out. I will PM you domain info.
- 09 Jun 2015 21:34
- Forum: How-to
- Topic: [howto] Installing and using opendkim with EFA 3.0.0.7
- Replies: 54
- Views: 558392
Re: [howto] Installing and using opendkim with EFA 3.0.0.7
I got this setup up and running, but verifying via http://dkimvalidator.com and other sites gives a DKIM failure with a wrong body hash.
Google says that some people have turned off the watermark in MailScanner, but that did not work for me. Anyone else having this issue?
Thanks.
Google says that some people have turned off the watermark in MailScanner, but that did not work for me. Anyone else having this issue?
Thanks.