efa-project.org

You're a genius. I disabled selinux and it started reporting bayes probability in MailWatch.

I usually disable selinux when I initially set up a server, so I'm not used to deal with selinux restrictions. Since this boxes were loaded using your iso image I didn't think of selinux blocking.

shawniverson wrote: 27 May 2024 15:11 MailWatch literally just parses the results from SpamAssassin when MailScanner calls it, so if it isn't showing in MailWatch, it didn't work...

Is SELinux enforcing on EFA2?

Yes it is.

Yes, what I pasted was running spamassassin as postfix user with the command you provided on the server that's connecting to the "remote" database.

My set up is this:

[EFA1] [EFA2] [EFA3]

Now, EFA1's bayes database is way more trained than the one used in EFA2 and EFA3.

The commands were run in ...

Yes, as you can see in the pasted data the line:

-5.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]

Is on both reports, the one using the local mysql database and the one using the remote database.

Using the local mysql bayes database:

Content analysis details: (-11.0 points, 5.0 required)

pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-5.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
-4.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL ...

Hello,

We have multiple eFa servers running as spam firewalls (for both incoming and outgoing emails). However we had some different spam scores based on the bayes database on each server. The next logical step was to use only 1 database, so this is what we did:

1. In one of our servers (the one ...