just fyi:
Upgrading : eFa-1:4.0.4-43.eFa.el8.noarch 35/84
Running scriptlet: eFa-1:4.0.4-43.eFa.el8.noarch 35/84
Preparing to update eFa...
ERROR 1067 (42000) at line 46: Invalid default value for 'lastsent'
Update completed successfully!
Search found 13 matches
- 02 May 2024 09:53
- Forum: 4.x Bugs
- Topic: error with update to 4.0.4-42
- Replies: 4
- Views: 24537
- 21 Apr 2024 16:57
- Forum: 4.x Bugs
- Topic: error with update to 4.0.4-42
- Replies: 4
- Views: 24537
Re: error with update to 4.0.4-42
Great, thanks for the info!
- 20 Apr 2024 15:50
- Forum: 3.x Bugs
- Topic: Lock database mailscanner - mtalog and mtalog_ids
- Replies: 7
- Views: 368305
Re: Lock database mailscanner - mtalog and mtalog_ids
Okay so here is my "solution":
first I cleared the mtalog_ids table without using a join:
DELETE FROM mtalog_ids WHERE smtp_id not in (SELECT msg_id FROM mtalog) LIMIT 100000;
(I ran this multiple times with a bash script and pause in between until there where no rows affected anymore).
then I ...
first I cleared the mtalog_ids table without using a join:
DELETE FROM mtalog_ids WHERE smtp_id not in (SELECT msg_id FROM mtalog) LIMIT 100000;
(I ran this multiple times with a bash script and pause in between until there where no rows affected anymore).
then I ...
- 20 Apr 2024 12:23
- Forum: 3.x Bugs
- Topic: Lock database mailscanner - mtalog and mtalog_ids
- Replies: 7
- Views: 368305
Re: Lock database mailscanner - mtalog and mtalog_ids
Hi,
out of the blue I'm also having this issue... every day my eFa install stops processing mails and if I check the mysql process list I see this "DELETE i.*, m.* FROM mtalog..." query with a very high runtime and it seems it blocks eFa from processing mails.
this issue appeared seemingly out of ...
out of the blue I'm also having this issue... every day my eFa install stops processing mails and if I check the mysql process list I see this "DELETE i.*, m.* FROM mtalog..." query with a very high runtime and it seems it blocks eFa from processing mails.
this issue appeared seemingly out of ...
- 20 Apr 2024 11:50
- Forum: 4.x Bugs
- Topic: error with update to 4.0.4-42
- Replies: 4
- Views: 24537
error with update to 4.0.4-42
Hi,
i just tried to update to 4.0.4-42 and got this info/error from yum:
should I be worried about:
ERROR 1067 (42000) at line 46: Invalid default value for 'lastsent'
Job for mariadb.service canceled.
MailWatch for MailScanner Database Upgrade to 1.2.23
Testing connectivity to the database ...
i just tried to update to 4.0.4-42 and got this info/error from yum:
should I be worried about:
ERROR 1067 (42000) at line 46: Invalid default value for 'lastsent'
Job for mariadb.service canceled.
MailWatch for MailScanner Database Upgrade to 1.2.23
Testing connectivity to the database ...
- 12 May 2021 11:54
- Forum: Discussion
- Topic: enable DSN
- Replies: 0
- Views: 7069
enable DSN
Hi there,
in order to get DSNs working, I read that you need to set MSMail Delivery Method = SMTP
are there any downsides / repercussions to changing it to SMTP instead of QMQP?
cheers,
Tobias
in order to get DSNs working, I read that you need to set MSMail Delivery Method = SMTP
are there any downsides / repercussions to changing it to SMTP instead of QMQP?
cheers,
Tobias
- 19 Nov 2020 14:16
- Forum: Discussion
- Topic: MailWatch Login Log
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3398
Re: MailWatch Login Log
The only thing I found was this line in "ssl_request_log":
84.112.4.48 TLSv1.3 TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 "GET /mailscanner/login.php?error=baduser HTTP/1.1"
this is not really something I could track with fail2ban because if someone just posts the login form but does not follow the redirect this is ...
84.112.4.48 TLSv1.3 TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 "GET /mailscanner/login.php?error=baduser HTTP/1.1"
this is not really something I could track with fail2ban because if someone just posts the login form but does not follow the redirect this is ...
- 15 Nov 2020 19:37
- Forum: Discussion
- Topic: question about default postfix config
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3109
Re: question about default postfix config
thanks for your reply. the reason why I ask is that this setting has more implication than I first thought. I was in the process of setting up a "destination_rate_delay" and wondering why it was not working, but having an destination_recipient_limit of 1 means some settings are per recipient and not ...
- 15 Nov 2020 15:07
- Forum: How-to
- Topic: Ideas? how easiest to block New Spam just has a name no domain in sender field
- Replies: 9
- Views: 12918
Re: Ideas? how easiest to block New Spam just has a name no domain in sender field
I also like to use "reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname" for "smtpd_client_restrictions". Argument being that everybody that is a responsible mailadmin should know about setting a ptr record for their IP.
- 15 Nov 2020 15:00
- Forum: Discussion
- Topic: question about default postfix config
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3109
question about default postfix config
Hi,
I saw that efa setup sets.
what is the reasoning behind this?
cheers,
Tobias
I saw that efa setup sets
Code: Select all
postconf -e "default_destination_recipient_limit = 1"
what is the reasoning behind this?
cheers,
Tobias
- 15 Nov 2020 12:20
- Forum: Discussion
- Topic: skip opendkim and spf check for outbound mail from internal source
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2177
skip opendkim and spf check for outbound mail from internal source
Hi,
I'm using EFA also as an outbound mail relay - so it delivers the mail from different sources in the internal network to the outside. is it possible to deactivate opendkim / spf checks for mails that originate in defined internal networks (like the ones defined unter Mail Settings->Outbound mail ...
I'm using EFA also as an outbound mail relay - so it delivers the mail from different sources in the internal network to the outside. is it possible to deactivate opendkim / spf checks for mails that originate in defined internal networks (like the ones defined unter Mail Settings->Outbound mail ...
- 15 Nov 2020 11:46
- Forum: Discussion
- Topic: MailWatch Login Log
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3398
MailWatch Login Log
Hi,
does someone know if MailWatch writes failed login attempts to a log file?
cheers,
Tobias
does someone know if MailWatch writes failed login attempts to a log file?
cheers,
Tobias
- 15 Nov 2020 11:05
- Forum: 4.x Bugs
- Topic: fresh EFA4 on CentOS 8 no logging
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1925
fresh EFA4 on CentOS 8 no logging
Hi,
some days ago I installed EFA4 with the one step installer (I guess 4.0.3) on a fresh CentOS 8 (CentOS-8.2.2004-x86_64-minimal.iso) but I noticed that there is nothing in e.g. maillog and I had to use "journalctl -u postfix -f" (but this also means that fail2ban would not detect anything)
I ...
some days ago I installed EFA4 with the one step installer (I guess 4.0.3) on a fresh CentOS 8 (CentOS-8.2.2004-x86_64-minimal.iso) but I noticed that there is nothing in e.g. maillog and I had to use "journalctl -u postfix -f" (but this also means that fail2ban would not detect anything)
I ...